How we decide what counts
The classification behind every relevance call
This page is powered by the Atlas Circular bill-tracker and analysis engine — the same pipeline behind the API. It screens the full U.S. legislative universe and ingests circular-economy law from the EU and national governments worldwide, testing every measure against a consistent set of circularity criteria — EPR, deposit-return, right-to-repair, recycled-content, financial-incentive, and labeling instruments across two dozen material & product streams — and auto-classifies the matches before a human spot-review. The goal is a judgment you can audit, not a black box.
We're transparent about how a call is made — the scope below, the pipeline, and the auto-classified-vs-reviewed marker on every bill. The engine itself — the exact screening lexicon, the model and prompts, and the confidence logic that ranks a match — is proprietary. That's the line: enough to trust and check a result, not enough to clone the system behind it.
A live snapshot — the engine re-runs as bills move and new sessions open.
What we screen for
- · Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) — incl. shared-responsibility & reverse-logistics regimes abroad
- · Deposit Return / bottle bills
- · Right to Repair
- · Recycled-Content mandates
- · Financial incentives (grants, tax credits, procurement)
- · Labeling & Disclosure
plastic packaging, paper packaging, glass, metals, electronics, batteries, paint, carpet, mattresses, tires, vehicles, construction, furniture, used oil, pharmaceuticals, solar panels, textiles, organics, bio-based materials, agriculture, hazardous materials, water, biodiversity.
How a bill gets classified
- 1. Ingest. Every bill from all 50 states and D.C. is pulled from Open States and refreshed as it moves, alongside circular-economy law from the EU and national governments worldwide, drawn from each jurisdiction's official source.
- 2. Pre-screen. A curated, weighted circular-economy lexicon narrows the full legislative universe to plausible candidates, so the deeper analysis is spent only on bills that might be relevant. (The specific terms and weights are proprietary.)
- 3. Classify. Each candidate is evaluated against the fixed criteria above and either flagged relevant — with a confidence score, policy instrument, and material tags — or set aside.
- 4. Extract. Relevant bills have their compliance specifics pulled from the bill text: deadlines, covered products, producer obligations, fees, and preemption signals.
- 5. Review. A growing subset is spot-checked by a human, which flips the bill's reviewed marker.
- 6. Re-screen. As a bill advances or its text changes, it's re-evaluated so the record stays current.
Auto-classified vs. reviewed
Each bill is first auto-classified: a language model reads the title, summary, and text and decides whether it touches one of the tracked instruments, with a confidence score and the material streams it affects. Compliance details (deadlines, covered products, producer obligations) are then extracted from the bill text.
A bill marked reviewed has additionally been spot-checked by a human. Anything not yet reviewed carries only the automated call — shown on each bill so you always know which is which.
Classifications are automated and can contain errors; always verify against the primary source before acting. We continuously expand the reviewed set.
See a miscall? Help us correct it.
Flag it →